IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v27y1981i4p243-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socialisation Scheme With a High Staff-Patient Ratio

Author

Listed:
  • D. Hollander
  • V. Bapuji Rao
  • E. McManoman
  • N. Harrington
  • A. Weeks
  • A. Mann

Abstract

Six months after a comprehensive socialisation scheme began, a prospective controlled study was carried out. The patients were tested in three practical sections — Cooking; Maintenance of Home and Clothing; Other Skills (eg. form-filling); and with a Questionnaire. Forty-eight members of an experimental group received socialisation training after initial testing. They and the 20 controls who did not undergo training were re-evaluated three months later. There was no significant difference between the groups in their initial scores. On retesting, the experimental group showed a significant improvement in Cooking (p

Suggested Citation

  • D. Hollander & V. Bapuji Rao & E. McManoman & N. Harrington & A. Weeks & A. Mann, 1981. "Socialisation Scheme With a High Staff-Patient Ratio," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 27(4), pages 243-252, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:27:y:1981:i:4:p:243-252
    DOI: 10.1177/002076408102700401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076408102700401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076408102700401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:27:y:1981:i:4:p:243-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.