IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v21y1975i3p220-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insanity Proceedings and Black-White State Hospital Admission Rate Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Joel See

    (St. Francis College, Biddeford, Maine)

Abstract

THIS study attempted to determine if the higher state hospital admission rates of blacks are due to greater proportions of blacks being adjudicated incompetent at county insanity hearings. The records of 2,264 cases from 12 Florida counties in 1969 and observations and interviews in the county courts were used to answer this question. With the exception of a slight difference in middle-sized counties, the higher rates of state hospital admission were found to be due to initial differences in petitioning to the court rather than to adjudication differences. The lack of difference is due to the fact that the proportion competent, when refined, proves to be very small for both blacks and whites, thus allowing for little variation by ethnicity. The operation of a racial stereotype was, however, demonstrated in a detailed analysis of one large county. The literature on state mental hospital admissions is replete with examples of higher rates for blacks when comparisons are made with whites (see, for example, 6, 8, 1). In fact, a recent review of such work concluded that blacks are often overrepresented at admission by ratios as high as 2: 1 (3). There has been little research, however, on the structural factors responsible for this pattern. This study asks if these differences occur because blacks are more likey than whites to be declared incompetent at county insanity hearings.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel See, 1975. "Insanity Proceedings and Black-White State Hospital Admission Rate Differences," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 21(3), pages 220-228, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:21:y:1975:i:3:p:220-228
    DOI: 10.1177/002076407502100309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076407502100309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076407502100309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:21:y:1975:i:3:p:220-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.