IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soasur/v31y2024i1p63-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democratisation and State–religion Relations in Post-authoritarian Indonesia and Pakistan (1998–2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Sohaib Khaliq

Abstract

Recent research on democratisation has highlighted the importance of religious actors in shaping political development. Scholars argue that the nature of state–religion relations could impact political activism of these actors. Comparing two of the largest Muslim countries in Asia, Indonesia and Pakistan, the objective of this article is to understand their post-authoritarian divergent political trajectories through an examination of their state–religion relations. Based on the comparative analysis of the institutional relationship and political theology, the article concludes that Indonesia and Pakistan differ in their respective patterns of state–religion relations, whereas the ‘respect-all’ model of Indonesia’s state–religion relations, characterised by mutual respect and accommodation between political authorities and religious institutions, helps consolidate its democracy by constructing institutional independence, its moderate political theology also embraces democratic values and pluralism. In contrast, Pakistan’s integrated state–religion relations, the absence of a ‘respect-all’ model, and its commitment to traditional political theology aimed at establishing an Islamic state pose challenges to its democratisation efforts. Drawing implications for peacebuilding and security, Indonesia’s state–religion relations could offer a potential model for Muslim democracy in South Asia and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohaib Khaliq, 2024. "Democratisation and State–religion Relations in Post-authoritarian Indonesia and Pakistan (1998–2018)," South Asian Survey, , vol. 31(1), pages 63-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:soasur:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:63-84
    DOI: 10.1177/09715231231223848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09715231231223848
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09715231231223848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soasur:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:63-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.