IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i5p657-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mannequin-Based Immersive Simulation Improves Resident Understanding of a Clinical Decision Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky
  • Jennifer M. Bellis
  • Son H. McLaren
  • Kristen Critelli
  • Sunday Clark
  • Zhengming Chen
  • Linda M. Gerber
  • Kevin Ching

Abstract

Objective. Simulation-based medical education may aid to standardize clinical performance measures, though there is little evidence for using an immersive, mannequin-based simulation for knowledge acquisition . We predicted that residents who had participated in an immersive simulation exercise illustrating the use of a clinical decision rule plus routine instructional methods (experimental group) would understand and implement this tool better than interns who participated in an immersive simulation focused on traumatic brain injury with intracranial hypertension plus routine instructional methods (control group 1). We further predicted that interns in the experimental group would understand and implement this tool as well as senior residents with more clinical experience (control group 2). Methods. This was a single center, prospective, simulation-based , randomized controlled trial. Pediatric interns were randomly assigned to clinically integrated teaching , plus a single, immersive simulation and structured debrief aimed at teaching this tool in minor head trauma (intervention), or clinically integrated teaching plus a related simulation on intracranial hypertension. Senior residents were used as an historical control arm and did not participate in a simulated encounter. Results. 20 interns (ten per group) participated in the study. Senior residents (n=40) served as historical comparisons. Interns in the intervention group scored similar to senior residents on a structured clinical observation score (median 64% vs. 57%), and better than interns in the placebo group (median 64% vs. 43%). Conclusions. In this study, a single immersive simulation improved resident learning and application of a clinical prediction rule when compared to standard resident education .

Suggested Citation

  • Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky & Jennifer M. Bellis & Son H. McLaren & Kristen Critelli & Sunday Clark & Zhengming Chen & Linda M. Gerber & Kevin Ching, 2017. "Mannequin-Based Immersive Simulation Improves Resident Understanding of a Clinical Decision Rule," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(5), pages 657-669, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:5:p:657-669
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878117719483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878117719483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878117719483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:5:p:657-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.