IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i4p513-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Gamified Training: Using Narrative to Improve Reactions and Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Michael B. Armstrong
  • Richard N. Landers

Abstract

Background and Aim. Gamification is growing in popularity in education and workplace training , but it is unclear which game elements are conducive to learning . The theory of gamified learning suggests that one type of gamification, the addition of game fiction/narrative , can be used to improve learning outcomes, and the Technology-Enhanced Training Effectiveness Model (TETEM) suggests individual differences impact the strength of this effect. From this theoretical basis, this study gamified a training module with game fiction in order to improve outcomes over the original training. Results and Conclusion. In a study of 273 learners, trainees were significantly more satisfied with training enhanced with game fiction over the control text ( d = 0.65) but did not differ in declarative knowledge scores by condition. Further, trainees in the control condition scored higher on procedural knowledge than trainees in the game fiction condition, although the effect was smaller ( d = −0.40). Thus, the use of narrative improved reactions to training but at some cost to training effectiveness. Attitudes toward game-based learning were also tested as a moderator of the condition-outcome relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael B. Armstrong & Richard N. Landers, 2017. "An Evaluation of Gamified Training: Using Narrative to Improve Reactions and Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 513-538, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:513-538
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878117703749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878117703749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878117703749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:513-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.