IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i3p324-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Christian K. Karl

Abstract

Background. The majority of bidding models , such as those developed by Friedman and Gates focus on the mark-up decision . Despite a large body of literature, particularly related to the construction industry, these bidding models largely ignore human behavior. Aim. This article has two aims. The first is to contribute to the potential use of business games to study the results of auction behavior in a construction business environment. The second is to investigate the winner’s curse and its effects on individual companies and the market . Method. The methodology for this study is rooted in game theory . The reasoning which leads to the winner’s curse is explored through a behavioral multi-actor experiment. I developed a database-driven, online multiplayer auction game which served as a laboratory experiment. The study included 42 participants. Data were collected during the game , and debriefing results were analyzed. Results. The results show that contractors suffer from the winner’s curse for a variety of reasons including their own bidding strategy , strong competition within the construction market , and inaccurate estimates of project costs . These reasons affect the behavior of contractors and the intention to win the project’s bid as well as their willingness to take risks. Conclusion and Recommendations. The approach outlined in this article contributes to decision-making research in the context of the ‘reverse’ auction low bid method. I recommend that future researchers consider second-price, sealed-bid auctions (Vickrey auctions); this type of auction is also easy to implement.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian K. Karl, 2016. "Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 324-345, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:3:p:324-345
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116633971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116633971
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116633971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:3:p:324-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.