IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i2p159-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn C. Koops
  • Ineke Verheul
  • Rinus Tiesma
  • Cees-Willem de Boer
  • Ruben T. Koeweiden

Abstract

Background . Many physics concepts can be abstract and difficult to learn from books or lectures. Experiments are frequently used to overcome such difficulties and provide a sound learning experience . However, some concepts may not be experienced through experimentation or may not be experienced in real life. Recently, computer games , based on physics simulations, have been utilized to provide an alternative learning tool . Aim . Educational games designed to overcome misconceptions have proven to provide an effective alternative learning option. In this research, the authors investigate if commercial entertainment games can be used to overcome misconceptions of Newton’s laws of motion as well. Method . The application of a commercial entertainment game as an effective learning tool in physics education is compared with a self-designed, 2-dimensional game . Results . Self-designed educational games induce a significantly higher learning gain than the commercial entertainment game . Conclusions and Recommendations . For teaching specific concepts using educational games, special-purpose games may produce larger learning gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn C. Koops & Ineke Verheul & Rinus Tiesma & Cees-Willem de Boer & Ruben T. Koeweiden, 2016. "Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 159-178, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:2:p:159-178
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116632871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116632871
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116632871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:2:p:159-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.