IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i1p73-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Better Digital Badges

Author

Listed:
  • Rudy McDaniel
  • Joseph Fanfarelli

Abstract

Background. Digital badges are used in games and simulations for purposes such as incentivizing learning, identifying progress , increasing time on task, and credentialing . Designing effective badges is complicated by psychological factors mediating the processes of recognizing, orienting toward, and acquiring badges. Aim. This article analyzes digital badges through mechanics and psychology . This approach involves understanding the underlying logics of badges as well as the experiential nature of badges-in-use. The proposed model provides additional insight about badges and recommends design strategies to complement existing scholarship. Procedure. This article examines an existing model of completion logic for digital badges. This model is expanded upon by pairing these formal mechanics with relevant psychological theory, summarizing key principles that pertain to how people interact with badges. It then considers three dimensions of badges-in-use—social, cognitive, and affective—reviewing examples and analyzing the relationship of badging to debriefing. Outcome. Understanding the relationships between formal completion logics and the psychological experience of badging allows designers to better design, deploy, and critique badging systems, leading to more effective implementations within simulation and gaming contexts. A design matrix and a series of design recommendations for badging are derived from the presented perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudy McDaniel & Joseph Fanfarelli, 2016. "Building Better Digital Badges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 73-102, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:73-102
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115627138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115627138
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115627138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:73-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.