IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v46y2015i2p209-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Theory and Working With Group Dynamics in Debriefing

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Hermann

Abstract

Purpose . The purpose of this article is to show how the group-dynamic approach , as developed by the social psychologist Kurt Lewin in his field theory , deepens learning during the debriefing phase. Design/Methodology/Approach . This article offers insight into Lewin’s field theory and its main principles for social learning within groups by addressing the group dynamics of simulation and gaming. We discuss the potential gains of using emerging group dynamics , and present concrete methodological suggestions. Findings . Seen from a systemic-constructivist view , group conflicts often mirror those in organizational, contextual, or social settings. These conflicts and contradictions can be made visible through emotions. Connecting emotions and simulation dynamics makes the insights for participants more relevant and easily transferable to real life situations. Limitations/Implications . Lewin’s ideas have spread widely, and many researchers have worked to develop them further. Lewin’s thoughts seem to be integral to Simulation & Gaming , although links to his work are not often cited or mentioned explicitly. Despite his theory’s apparent impact on much of gaming and simulation, many gamers still fail to integrate principles of group dynamics in game and debriefing design. Originality/Value . Group dynamic s during simulations are often close to real life experiences and can be very demanding. Facilitators may link group dynamics to the content of the simulation, thereby deepening social learning and the understanding of complex systems .

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Hermann, 2015. "Field Theory and Working With Group Dynamics in Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-220, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:2:p:209-220
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115596100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115596100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115596100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:2:p:209-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.