IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v45y2014i4-5p593-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • David Kirschner
  • J. Patrick Williams

Abstract

Aim . In this article, we develop a method, that we call the gameplay review method , for measuring players’ engagement with digital games through players’ interactions with video recordings of their own gameplay. Method . The gameplay review method arose from a microsociological study of the gameplay of eight young adults who each played approximately 20 hours of WORLD OF WARCRAFT over a 3-month period in 2012. Using data from in-depth interviews and audiovisual recordings of one of the eight participants, this article focuses on how the method leveraged participants’ knowledge of their experiences and ties that knowledge to measures of engagement . We outline the method’s four-step process ( producing Level I data, analyzing Level I data, producing Level II data, analyzing Level II data) to guide the generation and analysis of rich video data. The method involves focused discussions on selected recorded segments of participants’ gameplay and is a means of connecting game design with both empirical and interpretive data. Results . We show how, as participants progress, they learn about game design features and deepen their understanding of games . We found that participants’ developing perceptions of, and relationships to, design features affect their engagement with digital games. Conclusion . The gameplay review method is significant in its ability to measure engagement by dealing explicitly with empirical and interpretive data.

Suggested Citation

  • David Kirschner & J. Patrick Williams, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 593-610, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:593-610
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878114554185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878114554185
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878114554185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:593-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.