IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v42y2011i6p772-802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted Voting in the United Nations Security Council

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan R. Strand
  • David P. Rapkin

Abstract

Various observers have proposed weighted voting as part of an overhaul of the UN Security Council. This article employs game-theoretic methods to simulate the effects of weighting votes in the UN Security Council according to the ability of individual states, as well as on the ability of the Council to act. The authors first briefly review reform proposals. Drawing on recent proposals, they then calculate voting weights based on population, contributions to the UN, and a measure of sovereign equality. These component measures are assigned different weights in order to formulate three sets of weighted votes. After this, they define several measures of voting power that can be used to assess voting power in weighted voting systems. The measures used in this article assess the relative voting power of individual members as well as the probability the Council will engage in collective action to pass a resolution. Results of voting power simulations are then presented under both simple and qualified majority rules. The authors’ simulations indicate that under weighted voting the capacity of the Council to act is likely to increase under most conditions unless high qualified majorities are required. The simulations also demonstrate that the main problem identified with weighted voting—large deviations between voting weight and voting power—are not present in the weighted voting systems analyzed here.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan R. Strand & David P. Rapkin, 2011. "Weighted Voting in the United Nations Security Council," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(6), pages 772-802, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:6:p:772-802
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878110365514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878110365514
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878110365514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:6:p:772-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.