IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v42y2011i1p43-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning in Single-Versus Multiplayer Games: The More the Merrier?

Author

Listed:
  • Casper Harteveld

    (Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, c.harteveld@tudelft.nl, Deltares Institute for Delta Technology, Delft, the Netherlands)

  • Geertje Bekebrede

    (Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, g.bekebrede@tudelft.nl)

Abstract

From the observations of successful entertainment games, it is hypothesized that implementing a single-player option may require a different approach from that in a multiplayer option, in terms of game design. To find out whether this could be true and to understand what the specific approaches could entail for educational games, three separate yet related investigations were conducted to examine single- versus multiplayer games: an investigation of two educational games designed and evaluated by the authors, a theoretical investigation from a game and learning perspective, and an empirical investigation of 23 case studies. From these three investigations, it turned out that a “single-player approach†is data intensive, has formal rules, and uses direct transfer and individual learning. On the other hand, a “multiplayer approach†is less straightforward. From a game perspective, it can be characterized as process intensive and having social rules. When related to learning, however, it could be positioned on any dimension. This exploration shows that the approaches differ to a large extent and that designers have to find a fit between what option they choose and approach they take.

Suggested Citation

  • Casper Harteveld & Geertje Bekebrede, 2011. "Learning in Single-Versus Multiplayer Games: The More the Merrier?," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(1), pages 43-63, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:1:p:43-63
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878110378706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878110378706
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878110378706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:1:p:43-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.