IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v36y2005i1p9-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the long run: Biological versus economic rationality

Author

Listed:
  • Warren Thorngate

    (Carleton University, warrent@ccs.carleton.ca)

  • Mahin Tavakoli

    (Carleton University, mtkhomei@connect.carleton.ca)

Abstract

Eight computer simulations examined how long hypothetical gamblers could continue gambling without going broke in different games of chance. Gamblers began with a fixed amount of money and paid a fixed ante to play each game. Games had equal expected value but varied in their probability of winning and amount won. When the expected value was zero or positive, gamblers playing low ante, low-risk games (high chances of small wins) had longer runs than did gamblers playing high ante, high-risk games (low chances of big wins). When the expected value was negative, gamblers playing high-risk games had longer runs than gamblers playing low-risk games. The results extend Slobodkin and Rapoport’s concept of biological rationality and explain why people with limited wealth are wise to avoid risks in winning situations and take risks in losing situations, a central principle of prospect theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Warren Thorngate & Mahin Tavakoli, 2005. "In the long run: Biological versus economic rationality," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 36(1), pages 9-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:36:y:2005:i:1:p:9-26
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878104270471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878104270471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878104270471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:36:y:2005:i:1:p:9-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.