IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i3p2158244019870787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Chess on Standardized Test Score Gains

Author

Listed:
  • David I. Poston
  • Kathryn K. Vandenkieboom

Abstract

The study compares the standardized test performance of “chess kids†versus their peers. The comparison of score gains to non-chess peers (same grade and same academic percentile) attempts to eliminate the chicken-and-egg issue that often muddles this topic, that is, does chess make kids smarter or do smart kids simply prefer chess. The data indeed confirm that chess players are generally of higher academic standing (chess kids are smart), but more importantly it statistically shows that learning chess increases a student’s academic performance (chess makes them smarter). The evaluation then digs deeper, by comparing kids who have learned perhaps a little chess (coming to chess club only) versus those that are more serious and play in U.S. Chess Federation (USCF)-rated tournaments. A variety of comparisons are made which show that the benefits of chess are strongly tied to “learning†the game; the more you learn, the more you benefit. Kids who come only to chess club receive a small (5%-10%) benefit in Math, whereas kids who play in rated tournaments gain substantially in Math (30%-50%) and significantly in Reading (10%-20%). The benefits also continue to grow as kids play more tournaments and/or increase their USCF chess rating.

Suggested Citation

  • David I. Poston & Kathryn K. Vandenkieboom, 2019. "The Effect of Chess on Standardized Test Score Gains," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019870787
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019870787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019870787
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019870787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019870787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.