IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i3p2158244013497723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) and its domains in Brazilian athletes. The sample comprised 219 athletes from six sports, and included 127 men and 92 women, with mean age of 23.1 years (±5.2). All participants were associated with a sports organization and participated in official competitions at the professional, semiprofessional, and amateur levels, and completed a self-report demographics survey and the QLI during one testing session. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were utilized to compare differences between competitive levels and gender, respectively. Significant differences were reported between professional and amateur athletes for the socioeconomic ( p = .016; professional: 17.2, amateur: 15.1) and psychological/spiritual ( p = .011; professional: 24.3, amateur: 21.9) domains and between genders on the family domain ( p = .027; male: 21.8, female: 20.2). These findings suggest that professional athletes are more satisfied from a socioeconomic and psychological/spiritual perspective when compared with the amateur group. In addition, the results suggest that family issues are more satisfying and/or have less importance for males than for females. This study provides further insights into the quality of life of athletes and suggests differences based on competition levels and gender. Future studies are needed to further our understanding of the quality of life in athletes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos, 2013. "Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:2158244013497723
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013497723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013497723
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013497723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:2158244013497723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.