IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i2p2158244013484156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling Irrational Beliefs in the General Attitude and Belief Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay R. Owings
  • Geoffrey L. Thorpe
  • Elaine S. McMillan
  • Rachel D. Burrows
  • Sandra T. Sigmon
  • Dorothy C. Alley

Abstract

Accurate measurement of key constructs is essential to the continued development of Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT). The General Attitude and Belief Scale (GABS), a contemporary inventory of rational and irrational beliefs based on current REBT theory, is one of the most valid and widely used instruments available, and recent research has continued to improve its psychometric standing. In this study of 544 students, item response theory (IRT) methods were used (a) to identify the most informative item in each irrational subscale of the GABS, (b) to determine the level of irrationality represented by each of those items, and (c) to suggest a condensed form of the GABS for further study with clinical populations. Administering only the most psychometrically informative items to clients could result in economies of time and effort. Further research based on the scaling of items could clarify the specific patterns of irrational beliefs associated with particular clinical syndromes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay R. Owings & Geoffrey L. Thorpe & Elaine S. McMillan & Rachel D. Burrows & Sandra T. Sigmon & Dorothy C. Alley, 2013. "Scaling Irrational Beliefs in the General Attitude and Belief Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:2158244013484156
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013484156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013484156
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013484156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:2158244013484156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.