IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241309415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on English Language Teachers’ Lexical Attrition in Chinese Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Qiqin Hu
  • Bochra Kouider

Abstract

Research in the field of language attrition suggests that the use of a foreign language (FL) diminishes among language learners when it ceases to be actively employed. The present study aimed to investigate whether similar patterns of lexical attrition occurred among FL teachers, who were generally considered to possess a strong resistance to FL attrition. Specifically, this study sought to explore issues related to lexical attrition in the FL competence of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers within Chinese educational contexts. A questionnaire consisting of 34 items and a self-report scale on vocabulary were administered to a sample of 105 EFL teachers from 43 junior high schools in China, accompanied by interviews with 10 participants. The results revealed that five factors, namely teachers’ language contact, initial language proficiency, teachers’ concerns about maintaining language proficiency, teachers’ attitudes toward language learning, and artificially-intervened language use, accounted for 42% of the total variance and significantly influenced EFL teachers’ lexical attrition. Notably, initial language proficiency and language contact emerged as the most influential predictors of lexical attrition among teachers. These findings indicated that EFL teachers’ lexical attrition closely resembled that observed in other FL learner groups in China, which might have adverse implications for FL education in diverse ways. This research would provide valuable insights for improving the professional development of EFL teachers and enhancing FL education in such contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiqin Hu & Bochra Kouider, 2024. "A Study on English Language Teachers’ Lexical Attrition in Chinese Contexts," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241309415
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241309415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241309415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241309415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241309415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.