IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241303477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One Model or Six Models in Video Presentations When Viewing Alone and in Pairs?

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Xu
  • Qiudong Xia
  • Minxue Li
  • Jie Dai
  • Zhongling Pi
  • Zheng Zheng

Abstract

The current study examined the interaction effect of the number of models in videos and viewing type on the acquisition of a Tabata skill, a four-minute high-intensity interval training. We randomly recruited 316 Chinese undergraduate students (162 females and 154 males). They viewed either one model presentation or six models presentation under one viewing type (viewing alone vs. viewing in pairs). We found that for learners who viewed alone, those learning from the video with six models perceived higher levels of social presence, parasocial interaction, social partnership with models, motivation, learning satisfaction, and attention than those learning from the video with one model. The findings have some implications for the design of video presentations to teach motor skills: teachers are encouraged to design effective video presentations via presenting models and create co-viewing learning contexts to enhance learning experience and outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Xu & Qiudong Xia & Minxue Li & Jie Dai & Zhongling Pi & Zheng Zheng, 2024. "One Model or Six Models in Video Presentations When Viewing Alone and in Pairs?," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241303477
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241303477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241303477
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241303477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241303477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.