IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241299601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Psychological Contract Breach Affect Employee Silence? A Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Caisheng Liao
  • Zhao Li
  • Lijun Huang

Abstract

Psychological contract breach is widespread at work and is a major cause of employee silence. This study presents organizational identity and emotional exhaustion variables and creates a model to explain the mechanism of the effect of psychological contract breach on employee silence based on the cognitive-affective system theory of personality. The model is empirically examined using the partial least squares structural equation modeling approach, with 247 grassroots employees of the company as the research subjects. The main findings are as follows: psychological contract breach has a positive effect on employee silence; psychological contract breach can indirectly contribute to employee silence by decreasing organizational identity and increasing emotional exhaustion, respectively; optimism not only weakens the negative effect of psychological contract breach on organizational identity, but also weakens the positive effect of psychological contract breach on emotional exhaustion; furthermore, optimism negatively moderates the mediating effect of organizational identity and emotional exhaustion on the relationship between psychological contract breach and employee silence. This study enriches the research on the formation, triggering mechanisms, and boundary conditions of employee silence in the Chinese context. The findings contribute to the understanding of employee silencing behavior in Chinese companies from the perspective of employee emotions and organizational identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Caisheng Liao & Zhao Li & Lijun Huang, 2024. "How Does Psychological Contract Breach Affect Employee Silence? A Moderated Mediation Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241299601
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241299601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241299601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241299601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241299601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.