IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241288063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Break the Eclectic Choice: Can Green Credit Policy Restraint the Polluting Firms’ Financialization? Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Gu
  • Sijia Qiao

Abstract

The innovative use of green credit policy for financial regulation in environmental governance is a significant effort to balance environmental preservation and economic growth. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of green credit on the polluting firms’ eclectic business strategy, which is financialization, and the related mechanisms. Based on the sample of Chinese public firms from 2008 to 2019, we employ the DID model constructed by the Green Credit Guidelines promulgated in 2012 to investigate the causality between green credit policy and firms’ financialization. The results of theoretical and empirical studies show that the green credit policy helps to mitigate the financialization of heavy polluters compared to non-heavily polluting firms, thereby realizing the optimal allocation of financial resources. The mechanism test indicates that green credit policy has a suppressive effect on the financialization level of heavily polluting firms, mainly through promoting green innovation while reducing excess cash and banks’ credit willingness. The heterogeneity test further indicates that green credit policy is more pronounced in SOEs, strong environmental regulation enforcement regions and higher market competition industries. Our study confirms the effectiveness of green credit policies from the perspective of firms’ business strategy, which not only provides empirical evidence for the evaluation of green credit policy effects, but also sheds lights on the green transformation and sustainable development of heavily polluting firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Gu & Sijia Qiao, 2024. "Break the Eclectic Choice: Can Green Credit Policy Restraint the Polluting Firms’ Financialization? Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241288063
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241288063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241288063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241288063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241288063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.