IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241264190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair but Irresponsible: How Moral Senses Affect Young Males’ Attitudes Toward Extramarital Affairs

Author

Listed:
  • Tam-Tri Le
  • Ruining Jin
  • Minh-Hoang Nguyen
  • Quan-Hoang Vuong

Abstract

Extramarital affairs can be detrimental to family stability and individual happiness. Existing literature on the issue suggests that gender and moral qualities can be major influencing factors. Particularly, it is suggested that males are more likely to have affairs compared to females. In this study, we explore deeper possible gender differences together with the sense of responsibility and fairness in young people’s attitudes toward extramarital affairs from the perspective of information processing. Following the Bayesian Mindsponge Framework (BMF), we conducted Bayesian analyses on 493 university students from Germany, Vietnam, China, Taiwan, and Japan. Our analysis results show that males are more likely than females to think that extramarital affairs can be justified, but this gender difference is small in magnitude. In linear relationships, importance perceptions of fairness and responsibility do not have any clear effect on attitudes toward affairs. However, when considering the interactions between gender and these moral factors, we found that among males, those who put more importance on responsibility are less likely to think that extramarital affairs are justifiable, but those who put more importance on fairness are more likely to think that extramarital affairs are justifiable. These patterns may be due to how men interpret moral values in their subjective cost-benefit judgments toward marital relationships involving social expectations and personal preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Tam-Tri Le & Ruining Jin & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2024. "Fair but Irresponsible: How Moral Senses Affect Young Males’ Attitudes Toward Extramarital Affairs," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241264190
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241264190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241264190
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241264190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241264190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.