IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241257682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Legal Judgment Prediction Based on Deep Learning Multi-Fusion Models—Data from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Wen
  • Ping Ti

Abstract

Legal judgment prediction implies predicting judgment results based on the case description suitable for judgment predictions in legal terms, crimes, fines, and punishment. This study examines Chinese legal cases, focusing on legal predictions based on deep learning multiple fusion models. It aims to analyze case descriptions and predict legal terms and fines. The use of artificial intelligence models to predict the law can solve the problem of increasing workload of legal institutions and personnel because of the increasing number of cases; and simultaneously, reduce the differences in judgment. This will improve the efficiency and fairness of legal judgments. This study used the BDCI2017 dataset for experiments and applied deep learning algorithms to improve the prediction accuracy. Various models, such as TextCNN, TextRNN, Wide & TextCNN, and TextDenseNet classify cases and fines. Results revealed that TextDenseNet is better than the other model structures in terms of predictive accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Wen & Ping Ti, 2024. "A Study of Legal Judgment Prediction Based on Deep Learning Multi-Fusion Models—Data from China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241257682
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241257682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241257682
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241257682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola Lettieri & Antonio Altamura & Rosalba Giugno & Alfonso Guarino & Delfina Malandrino & Alfredo Pulvirenti & Francesco Vicidomini & Rocco Zaccagnino, 2018. "Ex Machina : Analytical platforms, Law and the Challenges of Computational Legal Science," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karolina Mania, 2023. "Legal Technology: Assessment of the Legal Tech Industry’s Potential," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 595-619, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241257682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.