IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241258300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Quality of Life for Rehabilitated Individuals: Evidence Based on Demographic, Psychological, and Rehabilitation Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Sanyin Cheng
  • Jiaqi Li
  • Yan Luo
  • Xuxu Li

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the effects of demographic, psychological, and rehabilitation factors on rehabilitated individuals’ family quality of life (FQoL). Methods: Fifty-one rehabilitation patients were conveniently sampled in mainland China to complete a demographic sheet, the Psychological Stress Questionnaire, the MSPSS-C Scale, and the Grit Scale. Mean comparison, ANOVA, and regression were used to test the relationships among variables. Results: Occupation and income were demographic factors slightly affecting FQoL. Middle-class participants had the highest FQoL and felt better about family interactions, parenting style, and physical and mental health. Psychological distress, two dimensions of risk perception, and physical and mental responses were psychological factors closely related to their recognition of their FQoL; family support impacted their recognition of the FQoL more directly than friends’ support; and individuals with more perseverance had higher recognition of the FQoL. Rehabilitation factors and treatment methods, duration, and satisfaction impacted family life treatment to varying degrees. Conclusion: During rehabilitation, attention should be paid to the rehabilitation patients ’ families, psychological factors, and treatment preferences. More reasonable and flexible rehabilitation programs should be provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanyin Cheng & Jiaqi Li & Yan Luo & Xuxu Li, 2024. "Family Quality of Life for Rehabilitated Individuals: Evidence Based on Demographic, Psychological, and Rehabilitation Factors," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241258300
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241258300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241258300
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241258300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241258300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.