IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241258285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Urbanization and Industrialization Deteriorate Environmental Quality? Empirical Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Duc Hong Vo
  • Chi Minh Ho
  • Anh The Vo

Abstract

Vietnam has transitioned from one of the poorest countries globally into a middle-income nation in three decades since the 1986 Economic Renovation (Doi Moi).However, this economic reform miracle has been widely supported by extensive urbanization and industrialization, leading to severe deterioration in environmental quality. While the effect of economic growth on environmental degradation has been extensively investigated, previous studies on Vietnam have largely ignored the role of urbanization and industrialization, the two key pillars in supporting economic growth in Vietnam. As such, this study focuses on the effect of urbanization and industrialization on environmental quality from 1985 to 2021 using the ARDL estimation. Our overall finding confirms that urbanization in Vietnam leads to further environmental degradation in the short run. However, this negative effect disappears in the long run. However, industrialization deteriorates environmental quality in both the short- and long-run. Our empirical results confirm the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in the presence of urbanization and industrialization in the Vietnamese context in the long run, implying that Vietnam’s environmental quality may be improved in the long run when a certain income level is met. These findings imply that the Vietnamese government should reconsider the priority of its industrialization strategy to ensure that sustainable economic growth is not at the expense of environmental quality in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Duc Hong Vo & Chi Minh Ho & Anh The Vo, 2024. "Do Urbanization and Industrialization Deteriorate Environmental Quality? Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241258285
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241258285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241258285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241258285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241258285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.