Author
Listed:
- Tadele Biresaw Belachew
- Asebe Hagos
- Ayal Debie
Abstract
In Ethiopia the government created an auditable pharmaceutical transaction system (APTS) to prevent low availability and high expiration rate of drugs. However, nothing is known about the implementation status of APTS in the study area. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the implementation status of APTS program by dimensions (availability, compliance, and acceptability) at Debark primary Hospital, North West Ethiopia. A single case study design was used to evaluate the process of the APTS program. Availability, compliance, and acceptability (client satisfaction) dimensions were measured using four, seven, and seven indicators respectively. In this evaluation, 423 clients participated in exit interviews, 600 records were reviewed, and five key informants were interviewed. To identify the predictor variables with acceptability, we used a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Statistically significant variables were defined based on the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and a p -value of less than .05. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. The overall implementation of APTS was 70% measured by availability (70.9%), compliance (70.4%), and acceptability (68.5%) dimensions. Ergometrine maleate injection, fluconazole tablet, and functional computer were not available. Government employees (AOR: 0.31, 95% CI [0.12, 0.76]) and clients’ who had a one-time visit (AOR: 2, 95% CI [1.11, 3.55]) were factors associated with the satisfaction of clients. The overall APTS program implementation was good. Unavailability of some tracer drugs, and functional computer were the main gaps. Therefore the program needs some improvement to enhance the implementation of APTS program.
Suggested Citation
Tadele Biresaw Belachew & Asebe Hagos & Ayal Debie, 2024.
"Evaluation of an Auditable Pharmaceutical Transaction Services Program in Ethiopia: A Case Study Evaluation Design,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241256960
DOI: 10.1177/21582440241256960
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241256960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.