IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241255846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects and Learners’ Perceptions of Cluster Analysis-Based Peer Assessment for Chinese Calligraphy Classes

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Huang
  • Chengche Qiao

Abstract

Calligraphy is the treasure of traditional Chinese culture and it is ubiquitous in China. Because of the unique aesthetic characteristics of calligraphy, the difficulty of calligraphy teaching lies in the assessment of calligraphy works. The major problems concerning calligraphy assessment are the low time efficiency of calligraphy assessment and low engagement of students in the assessing process. As an active learning method, peer assessment (PA) has been widely applied to education. This research aims to explore the application of PA to the calligraphy class. With reasonable training, elementary school students can act rationally as an assessing group. On the basis of students’ scores, this study further takes the most reasonable scores based on clustering analysis as the final score. Through the comparative analysis of the students’ scores and the teachers’ scores, it shows that the students’ scores of calligraphy writing can obtain results that are close to the teachers’ scores. The significance of the study lies in enhancing the time-efficiency of calligraphy assessment and maintaining the learners’ high levels of engagement in the assessing process. The results show that the use of PA in the assessment of calligraphy writing is an effective and accurate method of calligraphy assessment, which contributes to students’ command of the key points of calligraphy marking and plays an integral role in guiding students’ future calligraphy practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Huang & Chengche Qiao, 2024. "The Effects and Learners’ Perceptions of Cluster Analysis-Based Peer Assessment for Chinese Calligraphy Classes," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255846
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241255846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241255846
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241255846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.