IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241255503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Interpreting Styles in the Press Conferences of China’s “Two Sessionsâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Mengyao
  • Jin Bei

Abstract

On an annual basis, China’s “Two Sessions†draw researchers’ attention to the study of interpreting that comes along. However, the related research mostly focuses on interpreting strategies and skills, and rarely involves the interpreter who produces the interpreting. This paper collects both of two interpreters’ texts at the press conferences of the “Two Sessions†from 2010 to 2020 to build a parallel corpus. By comparing their interpreting, with the speeches of the leaders of the White House as a comparable corpus, the study seeks to probe into the similarities and differences between the interpreting styles of two interpreters from the linguistic perspective. It is found that when interpreting, the interpreter Sun has richer vocabulary and a higher lexical density than the interpreter Zhang. The interpreting style of Sun is closer to the written style, while Zhang’s style is more colloquial. Compared with the transcripts of the U.S. press conference, the linguistic features of Zhang’s interpreting is more similar to those in the comparable corpus in vocabulary richness, word length and readability. Therefore, Zhang’s interpreting might be more likely to be intelligible and acceptable to English speakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Mengyao & Jin Bei, 2024. "A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Interpreting Styles in the Press Conferences of China’s “Two Sessionsâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255503
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241255503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241255503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241255503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.