IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241241363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and Age Differences in Using Apology Strategies in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Munira Ali Al-Azraqi
  • Albandari Awad Alqahtani
  • Dalal Alfuhaid

Abstract

Apology has been an important topic in personal relationship studies over the past three decades. This study is based on Sugimoto’s empirically derived characterization of apology strategies and explores how Saudis of both genders and of different ages use apology strategies to demonstrate their politeness. The study’s three main objectives were to identify the most commonly employed apology strategies and to determine the significance of gender and of age on how people used apology strategies. Data collection relied on the Multiple Discourse Completion Task Questionnaire, which contains questions about different real-life scenarios and multiple answers that measure the use of apology strategies. It was distributed to 102 female and 93 male participants of different ages (between 18 and 50). The study established that the most used apology strategies are self-blame and then compensation , while the least used are blaming the victim and asking the victim not to be angry . The rest of the apology strategies occur at different frequencies. The study also found that women use apology strategies significantly more than men do. Women tend to use thanking , lack of intent , asking for forgiveness , and asking the victim not to be angry , whereas men use compensation , avoiding the victim , blaming the victim , promising not to repeat , and offending the victim more than women do. In addition, the study found significant differences in which apology strategies people of different ages used.

Suggested Citation

  • Munira Ali Al-Azraqi & Albandari Awad Alqahtani & Dalal Alfuhaid, 2024. "Gender and Age Differences in Using Apology Strategies in Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241241363
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241241363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241241363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241241363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241241363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.