IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i1p21582440241234754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of Instructors’ Explanations in Online EMI Lectures in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongmei Liang

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to reveal features of instructors’ explanations in online EMI lectures in China. Through a mixed methods case study, the researcher examined the distribution and linguistic realizations of different types of explanations in the lectures of two online EMI courses and how the instructors and students perceived the explanations. The results showed that instructors’ explanations were prevalent in the lectures of both courses with expositions being the most dominant type regardless of subject contents whereas the other explanation types such as comparisons, clarifications, additions, justifications, solutions and generalizations being subject-specific. Moreover, both instructors were capable of using various linguistic devices for different types of explanations despite some linguistic mistakes in explanations. The results also showed that instructors chose particular types of explanations mainly because of the specific teaching aims and methods of the course, and that students were positive about instructors’ use of different types of explanations in the lectures except for the suggestions that one of the instructors’ pronunciation be improved and more visual means be used to aid explanations. The study has implications for future research on enhancing EMI instructors’ explanatory capacity and addressing students’ linguistic discomfort with EMI lectures in a broader sense.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongmei Liang, 2024. "A Case Study of Instructors’ Explanations in Online EMI Lectures in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241234754
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241234754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241234754
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241234754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241234754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.