IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231218811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing Academic Identity Through Critical Argumentation: A Narrative Inquiry of Chinese EFL Doctoral Students’ Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Juliana Othman
  • Yueh Yea Lo

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the experiences of Chinese EFL doctoral students in constructing their academic identities through critical argumentation in their thesis writing in an English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) context. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Narrative analysis was used to examine participants’ thesis writing to gain insights into their experiences of academic identity construction. The results revealed that Chinese EFL doctoral students face challenges in developing a critical voice and authorial position, synthesizing multiple sources, and positioning themselves rhetorically in their writing. Furthermore, the results open possibilities for a broader understanding of academic writing that values international graduate student’s educational background and cultural diversity in target English language discourse communities. While the narrative inquiry study on Chinese EFL doctoral students’ academic identity construction through critical argumentation is insightful, there are several limitations to consider, mainly due to the small sample size of only two female Chinese respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliana Othman & Yueh Yea Lo, 2023. "Constructing Academic Identity Through Critical Argumentation: A Narrative Inquiry of Chinese EFL Doctoral Students’ Experiences," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231218811
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231218811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231218811
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231218811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donghong Liu & Jing Huang, 2021. "Rhetoric Construction of Chinese Expository Essays: Implications for EFL Composition Instruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yujiao Zhang, 2023. "A Multidimensional Analysis of Language Use in English Argumentative Essays: An Evidence From Comparable Corpora," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231218811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.