IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231210080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shareholding Network of Institutional Investors and the Information Efficiency of Capital Market: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Guang Liu
  • Hong Yi
  • Chih-Ping Yu

Abstract

A higher efficient capital market and direct financing environment are key to excellent enterprise performance and high-quality economic development in China. In recent years, institutional investors have gradually significantly impacted market information efficiency, while the existing studies still offer different conclusions. Given this, firstly, we chose the social network analysis as the study method, taking the open-ended equity mutual funds in the A-share stock market from 2010 to 2019 as samples, constructing the shareholding networks by taking the top ten bulk-holding stocks in every sample fund’s annual report as the connection. Then, we chronologically reveal the characteristics of those networks, such as scale, density, centrality, and so on. Lastly, we empirically test the influence of the institutional investors embedded in the shareholding networks on the information efficiency, and so does the robustness check. The results show that the shareholding networks are gradually expanding in scale and increasing in density. Furthermore, institutional investors can improve stock price informativeness and promote market information efficiency through a shareholding network, and the higher the network location of institutional investors, the greater the information effect. The conclusions based on the systemic view not only enrich the research on the information function of institutional investors, broaden the field of social network theory, but also provide guidance for regulating institutional investors and improving market transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Guang Liu & Hong Yi & Chih-Ping Yu, 2023. "Shareholding Network of Institutional Investors and the Information Efficiency of Capital Market: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231210080
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231210080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231210080
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231210080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paolo Colla & Antonio Mele, 2010. "Information Linkages and Correlated Trading," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 203-246, January.
    2. Allen, Franklin & Qian, Jun & Qian, Meijun, 2005. "Law, finance, and economic growth in China," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 57-116, July.
    3. Grossman, Sanford J & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1980. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 393-408, June.
    4. Syed Aliya Zahera & Rohit Bansal, 2018. "Do investors exhibit behavioral biases in investment decision making? A systematic review," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 210-251, May.
    5. Rohit Bansal & Dharmendra Singh & David McMillan, 2021. "Efficiency drivers of insurers in GCC: an analysis incorporating company-specific and external environmental variables," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1922179-192, January.
    6. Rakesh Kumar Verma & Rohit Bansal, 2021. "Impact of macroeconomic variables on the performance of stock exchange: a systematic review," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(7), pages 1291-1329, August.
    7. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    8. El-Khatib, Rwan & Fogel, Kathy & Jandik, Tomas, 2015. "CEO network centrality and merger performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 349-382.
    9. Syed Aliya Zahera & Rohit Bansal, 2019. "A study of prominence for disposition effect: a systematic review," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 2-21, May.
    10. Ekkehart Boehmer & Eric K. Kelley, 2009. "Institutional Investors and the Informational Efficiency of Prices," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(9), pages 3563-3594, September.
    11. Brian J. Bushee & Theodore H. Goodman, 2007. "Which Institutional Investors Trade Based on Private Information About Earnings and Returns?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 289-321, May.
    12. Johan Walden, 2019. "Trading, Profits, and Volatility in a Dynamic Information Network Model," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(5), pages 2248-2283.
    13. Bajo, Emanuele & Chemmanur, Thomas J. & Simonyan, Karen & Tehranian, Hassan, 2016. "Underwriter networks, investor attention, and initial public offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 376-408.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Rui & Guo, Junfei & Yu, Wensong, 2023. "Sponsor, institutional investor, and quotation behavior: Theory and evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 411-428.
    2. Chen, Yong & Kelly, Bryan & Wu, Wei, 2020. "Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 316-341.
    3. Jennifer N. Carpenter & Fangzhou Lu & Robert F. Whitelaw, 2015. "The Real Value of China's Stock Market," NBER Working Papers 20957, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Zhibing Li & Jie Liu & Xiaoyu Liu & Chonglin Wu, 2024. "Investor attention and stock price efficiency: Evidence from quasi‐natural experiments in China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 53(1), pages 175-225, March.
    5. Lou, Youcheng & Parsa, Sahar & Ray, Debraj & Li, Duan & Wang, Shouyang, 2019. "Information aggregation in a financial market with general signal structure," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 594-624.
    6. Carpenter, Jennifer N. & Lu, Fangzhou & Whitelaw, Robert F., 2018. "The real value of China's stock market," BOFIT Discussion Papers 2/2018, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    7. Richardson, Scott & Tuna, Irem & Wysocki, Peter, 2010. "Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 410-454, December.
    8. repec:zbw:bofitp:2018_002 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Luo, Ronghua & Zhao, Senyang & Zhou, Jing, 2023. "Information network, public disclosure and asset prices," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Li, Huixuan & Chen, Jing, 2022. "Does higher investments necessarily reduce stock returns?☆," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Pereira da Silva, Paulo, 2021. "Do managers pay attention to the market? A review of the relationship between stock price informativeness and investment," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Zhang, Chris H. & Frijns, Bart, 2019. "Noise trading and informational efficiency," EconStor Preprints 198037, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    13. Goodell, John W. & Kumar, Satish & Rao, Purnima & Verma, Shubhangi, 2023. "Emotions and stock market anomalies: A systematic review," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Bohl, Martin T. & Irwin, Scott H. & Pütz, Alexander & Sulewski, Christoph, 2023. "The impact of financialization on the efficiency of commodity futures markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    15. Murphy, Austin, 2012. "Biology-induced effects on investor psychology and behavior," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 20-25.
    16. Carpenter, Jennifer N. & Lu, Fangzhou & Whitelaw, Robert F., 2018. "The real value of China’s stock market," BOFIT Discussion Papers 2/2018, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    17. Baltakienė, Margarita & Kanniainen, Juho & Baltakys, Kęstutis, 2021. "Identification of information networks in stock markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Carpenter, Jennifer N. & Lu, Fangzhou & Whitelaw, Robert F., 2018. "The real value of China’s stock market," BOFIT Discussion Papers 2, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    19. Lou, Youcheng & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "The equivalence of two rational expectations equilibrium economies with different approaches to processing neighbors’ information," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 93-105.
    20. Lou, Youcheng & Yang, Yaqing, 2023. "Information linkages in a financial market with imperfect competition," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    21. repec:zbw:bofitp:002 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Bohl, Martin T. & Pütz, Alexander & Sulewski, Christoph, 2021. "Speculation and the informational efficiency of commodity futures markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231210080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.