IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231209583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting a Technological Progress Path and Upgrading Export Product Quality: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Feng
  • Hong Liu
  • Yuwei Liu
  • Hengyuan Zhao

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of different technological progress paths on firms’ export product quality in China based on Fixed Effect and System GMM models. Using matched data from 2000 to 2010 from the Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database, the Chinese Customs Database and the list of overseas investment enterprises, we find that the four paths (OFDI, FDI, import of intermediate goods, and R&D) can all significantly improve firms’ export product quality; Among them, OFDI has the most significant effect, followed by import of intermediate goods, FDI, and R&D, in that order. The results remain robust after considering selectivity bias and sample endogeneity. The heterogeneity test shows that the path of technological progress is more significant in improving the quality of export products of private, eastern, labor-intensive and processing trade enterprises. The article suggests that Chinese enterprises should further expand OFDI levels, fully stimulate the innovation energy of private enterprises, and emphasize the key role of independent innovation in promoting the upgrading of export product quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Feng & Hong Liu & Yuwei Liu & Hengyuan Zhao, 2023. "Selecting a Technological Progress Path and Upgrading Export Product Quality: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231209583
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231209583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231209583
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231209583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stavros Poupakis, 2022. "Does FDI in Upstream and Downstream Sectors Facilitate Quality Upgrading? Evidence from Russian Exporters," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(2), pages 451-471, April.
    2. Hongfeng Peng & Jingwen Yu, 2021. "Absorptive capacity and quality upgrading effect of OFDI: Evidence from China," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 651-671, December.
    3. Faheem Ur Rehman & Yibing Ding, 2020. "The nexus between outward foreign direct investment and export sophistication: new evidence from China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 357-365, March.
    4. Bas, Maria & Paunov, Caroline, 2021. "Input quality and skills are complementary and increase output quality: Causal evidence from Ecuador’s trade liberalization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Maria Bas & Vanessa Strauss-Kahn, 2013. "Input-Trade Liberalization, Export Prices and Quality Upgrading," Working Papers hal-03460775, HAL.
    6. Yuegang Song & Yaoguo Wu & Guoying Deng & Pengfei Deng, 2021. "Intermediate Imports, Institutional Environment, and Export Product Quality Upgrading: Evidence from Chinese Micro-Level Enterprises," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 400-426, January.
    7. Stiebale, Joel & Vencappa, Dev, 2018. "Acquisitions, markups, efficiency, and product quality: Evidence from India," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 70-87.
    8. Brambilla, Irene & Porto, Guido G., 2016. "High-income export destinations, quality and wages," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 21-35.
    9. Crinò, Rosario & Ogliari, Laura, 2017. "Financial imperfections, product quality, and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 63-84.
    10. Yue-Yi Zhang & Han-Ting Zhou & Ijaz Younis & Li Zhou, 2021. "Coupling Coordination Analysis of Technological Innovation, Standards, and Quality: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    11. Xianhai Huang & Xueyin Song, 2019. "Internet use and export upgrading: Firm‐level evidence from China," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 1126-1147, September.
    12. Mary Amiti & Amit K. Khandelwal, 2013. "Import Competition and Quality Upgrading," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 476-490, May.
    13. Li, Linjie & Liu, Xiaming & Yuan, Dong & Yu, Miaojie, 2017. "Does outward FDI generate higher productivity for emerging economy MNEs? – Micro-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 839-854.
    14. Amit K. Khandelwal & Peter K. Schott & Shang-Jin Wei, 2013. "Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2169-2195, October.
    15. Robert C. Feenstra & John Romalis, 2014. "International Prices and Endogenous Quality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(2), pages 477-527.
    16. Manova, Kalina & Yu, Zhihong, 2017. "Multi-product firms and product quality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 116-137.
    17. Jing Xie & Qi Sun & Shaohong Wang & Xiaoping Li & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Environmental Regulation Affect Export Quality? Theory and Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Frank Crowley & Philip McCann, 2018. "Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(11), pages 1203-1221, March.
    19. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Thanh Dinh Su, 2021. "Export quality dynamics: Multidimensional evidence of financial development," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 2319-2343, August.
    20. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Mukunoki, Hiroshi & Yang, Chih-hai, 2020. "Liberalization for services FDI and export quality: Evidence from China," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    21. Jiayun Xu & Qilin Mao, 2018. "On the relationship between intermediate input imports and export quality in China," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 26(3), pages 429-467, July.
    22. Yuan Jiang & Jianwen Qin & Hayat Khan, 2022. "The Effect of Tax-Collection Mechanism and Management on Enterprise Technological Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    23. Bas, Maria & Strauss-Kahn, Vanessa, 2015. "Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 250-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gideon Ndubuisi & Solomon Owusu, 2021. "How important is GVC participation to export upgrading?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(10), pages 2887-2908, October.
    2. Gideon Ndubuisi & Solomon Owusu, 2022. "Trust, Efficient Contracting and Export Upgrading," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(6), pages 2708-2729, December.
    3. Freitag, Andreas & Lein, Sarah M., 2023. "Endogenous product adjustment and exchange rate pass-through," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Fan, Haichao & Li, Yao Amber & Yeaple, Stephen R., 2018. "On the relationship between quality and productivity: Evidence from China's accession to the WTO," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 28-49.
    5. Yang, Shubo & Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Wang, Yanming & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2023. "Enhancing export product quality through innovative cities: A firm-level quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 462-478.
    6. Bastos, Paulo & Silva, Joana, 2010. "The quality of a firm's exports: Where you export to matters," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 99-111, November.
    7. Copestake, Alexander & Zhang, Wenzhang, 2023. "Inputs, networks and quality-upgrading: Evidence from China in India," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Gideon Ndubuisi, 2024. "Patent Enforcement and Quality Upgrading of Exported Products," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13979-14011, September.
    9. He, Dongwei & Wang, Yunfei & You, Kai, 2023. "Market entry and the dynamics of export product quality: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 692-706.
    10. Bas, Maria & Paunov, Caroline, 2021. "Input quality and skills are complementary and increase output quality: Causal evidence from Ecuador’s trade liberalization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Bas, Maria & Paunov, Caroline, 2021. "Disentangling trade reform impacts on firm market and production decisions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Feng, Ling & Li, Zhiyuan & Swenson, Deborah L., 2016. "The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-101.
    13. Kong, Dongmin & Shi, Zheng & Xiong, Mengxu, 2024. "Currency overvaluation and export product quality: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Shang, Di & Diao, Gang & Zhao, Xiaodi, 2020. "Have China's regulations on imported waste paper improved its quality," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Maria Bas & Caroline Paunov, 2019. "What gains and distributional implications result from trade liberalization," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 19003, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    16. Longzhou Wang, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firms’ Product Quality: Evidence from Chinese Exporters," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 645-672, November.
    17. Ganguly, Shrimoyee & Acharyya, Rajat, 2022. "Devaluation, Export Quality and Employment in A Small Dependent Economy," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 47(1), pages 137-165, March.
    18. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Mukunoki, Hiroshi & Yang, Chih-hai, 2020. "Liberalization for services FDI and export quality: Evidence from China," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Lei Liu & Kai He & Yi Qiao & Peilin Fu & Qinggang Meng, 2023. "Entrepreneurship and Export Product Quality Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Liu, Qing & Qiu, Larry D. & Zhan, Chaoqun, 2024. "FDI inflows and export quality: Domestic competition and within-firm adjustment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231209583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.