IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i3p21582440231192928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of Korea’s Medication Management Mobile Application

Author

Listed:
  • Sun Kyung Kim
  • Hye Ri Hwang
  • Youngho Lee
  • Yeongju Kim

Abstract

There is a growing interest in digital healthcare to manage disease and improve medication compliance. In Korea, the health apps market continues to grow, however, little research has been done on their content and quality. A thorough assessment beyond the current star rating would ensure the safety and effectiveness of health apps. A systematic search was conducted in the Google Play and Apple App Store. The Korean version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to access and systematically evaluate the contents of available medication management apps. Descriptions and technical information about the app were collected based on AppStore and the software company’s website. A total of 2,135 apps were identified and 39 apps were evaluated by four independent reviewers. Of the apps included, 17.9% were paid ones, at a cost between $2 and $4. The oldest was developed 11 years ago and 5 apps (12.8%) were released within the last year. The study results identified the features of apps used to manage medications, ranging from reminders to connecting to IoT devices. In addition, relationships were identified between the input variables studied, including health professionals, updates, and quality scores using MARS. The findings of this review highlight the importance of quality control with adequate features and continuous maintenance in health apps. In addition, to achieve effectiveness with good medication adherence, along with the inclusion of health professionals, close collaboration with all stakeholders in addition to the proper integration of newly updated technology is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun Kyung Kim & Hye Ri Hwang & Youngho Lee & Yeongju Kim, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Korea’s Medication Management Mobile Application," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231192928
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231192928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231192928
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231192928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yupeng Liu & Yutao Yang & Yue Liu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2019. "Improving Sustainable Mobile Health Care Promotion: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valmohammadi, Changiz & Khaki, Masoud Mirahmadi, 2019. "Determinants for selection of projects for exploitation of mines in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Pamucar, Dragan & Ecer, Fatih & Chatterjee, Prasenjit, 2021. "An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Yu Fu & Yuanyuan Wang & Xinhui Ye & Weifang Wu & Jianfeng Wu, 2023. "Satisfaction with and Continuous Usage Intention towards Mobile Health Services: Translating Users’ Feedback into Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2019. "Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano & Najmeh Rahmani, 2020. "Waste Reduction for Green Service Supply Chain—the Case Study of a Payment Service Provider in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    8. Na Yu & Yi-Ting Huang, 2020. "Important Factors Affecting User Experience Design and Satisfaction of a Mobile Health App—A Case Study of Daily Yoga App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhang, Hejie & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Ye, Cheng-Zhou & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi, 2022. "Evaluating smart office buildings from a sustainability perspective: A model of hybrid multi-attribute decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231192928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.