IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i3p21582440231185699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of Chinese Character Size Tests From 1930 to 2021

Author

Listed:
  • Haiwei Zhang
  • Peijian Paul Sun
  • Xueyan Zhang
  • Silin Fan
  • Yunji Zhang

Abstract

Chinese character size is the number of characters that a person can recognize and has been well documented as a critical measure of Chinese literacy. A variety of Chinese character size tests have been developed since the 1930s. However, systematic reviews have not yet been conducted on Chinese character size tests. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of Chinese character size tests conducted between 1930 and 2021 among native Chinese-speaking children and Chinese language learners. There are three main findings. First, most character size tests were constructed using a frequency-based stratified-sampling method to select target characters, a mixed method focusing on both pronunciation and meaning to test target characters, and a holistic method to score the test-takers’ responses. Second, the majority of tests used Classical Testing Theory (CTT) for checking the item quality, reliability, and validity, and only two tests employed both CTT and Item Response Theory. Third, most tests estimated character sizes using CTT, while only three tests constructed character size norms. It is suggested that future studies address cross-group investigation, determine the most robust construction and estimation methods, develop computer-assisted tests, and apply character size tests to classroom settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiwei Zhang & Peijian Paul Sun & Xueyan Zhang & Silin Fan & Yunji Zhang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Chinese Character Size Tests From 1930 to 2021," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231185699
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231185699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231185699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231185699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231185699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.