IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i2p21582440231178258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Greater Bay Area Plan and Hong Kong: How Phraseologies Represent Different Voices in the Media

Author

Listed:
  • Zhide Hou

Abstract

This study applies phraseologies to the comparative examination of China’s Greater Bay Area plan between Chinese and Anglo-American English-language press. Findings show that the Chinese texts are concerned in promoting cross-border Greater Bay Area integrated development allied with positive references to the role of Hong Kong, whereas the Anglo-American texts construct the Greater Bay Area plan as a political project and place emphasis on the negative impact on Hong Kong. Also, while the Chinese texts focus on government support to legitimate the plan, the Anglo-American texts underline political threat to Hong Kong as a form of delegitimation. This study explicated the social-political factors behind each particular way of representation by presenting an approach that could yield insights into the new politicalized Hong Kong.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhide Hou, 2023. "China’s Greater Bay Area Plan and Hong Kong: How Phraseologies Represent Different Voices in the Media," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231178258
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231178258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231178258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231178258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Hills & Elad Segev, 2014. "The news is American but our memories are … Chinese?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(9), pages 1810-1819, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sendhil Mullainathan & Andrei Shleifer, 2005. "The Market for News," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1031-1053, September.
    2. Stefan M. Herzog & Thomas T. Hills, 2019. "Mediation Centrality in Adversarial Policy Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231178258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.