IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i1p21582440231155334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vocabulary Demands of Academic Spoken English Revisited: A Case of University Lectures and TED Presentations

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Huynh Trang
  • Duyen Thi Bich Nguyen
  • Hung Tan Ha

Abstract

The article shines light upon the differences in the vocabulary demands of academic spoken discourse between three broad scientific disciplines: Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Social Sciences. By employing the Academic Word List (AWL) and British National Corpus/Corpus of Contemporary American English (BNC/COCA) wordlist, the present study analyzed data of the transcripts from 160 university lectures, 39 seminars, and 600 TED talks. Results from the analysis of the 2.5-million-token corpus demonstrated an order of lexical difficulty in which Life Sciences and Social Sciences were the most and least lexically demanding fields of study, correspondingly. Research findings also indicated a strong supportive relationship between the AWL and the BNC/COCA wordlist. Learners with limited vocabulary knowledge at 1,000 and 2,000 levels could significantly increase their lexical coverage for academic lectures, seminars, and presentations with the support of the AWL. For disciplines with low lexical demands like Social Sciences, the vocabulary knowledge of nearly 2,570 word families (BNC/COCA 2,000 + AWL) could help students understand 95.07% of the running words in universities lectures and seminars. Research findings offer implications for vocabulary teaching and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Huynh Trang & Duyen Thi Bich Nguyen & Hung Tan Ha, 2023. "Vocabulary Demands of Academic Spoken English Revisited: A Case of University Lectures and TED Presentations," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440231155334
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231155334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231155334
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231155334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doan Hieu Phung & Hung Tan Ha, 2022. "Vocabulary Demands of the IELTS Listening Test: An In-Depth Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nhu Huynh Le & Hung Tan Ha, 2023. "Lexical Demands of Academic Written English: From Students’ Assignments to Scholarly Publications," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440231155334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.