IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i1p21582440231153851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Sunday Ugwuanyi
  • Marcus Jideofor Ezema
  • Emmanuel Ifeanyi Orji

Abstract

This study determined the efficacies of cognitive conflict and 5E instructional models on students’ conceptual change achievement and self-efficacy in particulate nature of matter concepts in physics. In this study, non-equivalent groups quasi-experimental design was used. A sample of 195 senior secondary school year 1 students (SSI) with an average age of ( M  = 14.64, SD  = 3.34) was used. Particulate Nature of Matter Conceptual Change Test (PNMCCT), and Particulate Nature of Matter Self-Efficacy Scale (PNMSES) were used to collect data. The SES was adapted and consists of 30 items of four-point Likert-type. A trial test was done on 20 SS1 physics students using the validated instrument. The estimate of internal consistency of .86 and a temporal stability of .99 were obtained for PNMCCT while an estimate of internal consistency of .71 was obtained for PNMSES. Before treatment, the initial conceptual change achievement and self-efficacy of the subjects were established using PNMCCT and PNMSES. After the treatment, the PNMCCT and PNMSES instruments were administered to the subjects as a posttest. Mean was used to answer the research questions while analysis of covariance was used to test the hypotheses at a 5% level of significance. The result showed that students’ conceptual change achievement and self-efficacy were significantly enhanced after exposure to 5E instructional treatment than that of cognitive conflict. Thus, it was recommended that the 5E instructional model should be adopted by physics teachers for the effective improvement of physics students’ self-efficacy in schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Sunday Ugwuanyi & Marcus Jideofor Ezema & Emmanuel Ifeanyi Orji, 2023. "Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440231153851
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231153851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231153851
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231153851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. C. Madu & Emma Orji, 2015. "Effects of Cognitive Conflict Instructional Strategy on Students’ Conceptual Change in Temperature and Heat," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440155, July.
    2. Sevda Yerdelen-Damar & Haki Pesman, 2013. "Relations of Gender and Socioeconomic Status to Physics Through Metacognition and Self-Efficacy," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(4), pages 280-289, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440231153851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.