IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i4p21582440221138259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivational Strategies Adopted in Postgraduate English Academic Writing Courses: Perspectives of Doctoral Students

Author

Listed:
  • Tim S. O. Lee
  • Linda H. F. Lin

Abstract

Despite postgraduates’ struggles to master English academic writing, the fulfilment of postgraduates’ motivational needs in classes of English academic writing has been scarcely researched. This study examines the motivational practices of teachers of postgraduate English academic writing, the perceived effectiveness of the adopted strategies, and possible ways to further enhance their effectiveness. Reflective writing was collected from 59 doctoral students who spoke English as a foreign language (EFL) and were enrolled in a thesis writing course. The major findings are: (1) The reported motivational strategies correspond fairly closely to those endorsed in Dörnyei’s influential framework, yet some appear to be common teaching techniques; (2) the majority of the reported positive effects pertain to enhanced knowledge, performance, and confidence; and (3) the participants called for increased use of motivational strategies, more student engagement, and diverse facilitative input from the English teacher. The findings confirm the need to extend studies on the use and perceptions of motivational strategies to postgraduate language teaching contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim S. O. Lee & Linda H. F. Lin, 2022. "Motivational Strategies Adopted in Postgraduate English Academic Writing Courses: Perspectives of Doctoral Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221138259
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221138259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221138259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221138259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221138259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.