IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221116105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring University EFL Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Teacher Efficacy in Technology-integrated Flipped Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Zhang
  • Xiaotian Fang

Abstract

This qualitative study explored teachers’ knowledge and teacher efficacy about implementing technology-integrated flipped classroom (FC) in higher education. Using the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework and teacher efficacy theories, the study probed the experiences and perceptions reported by 12 university teachers of English as a foreign language. Six themes emerged from the study. Themes 1 to 3 depicted how the EFL teachers practiced the three essential teaching tasks of technology-integrated FC. By incorporating the instructional design of FC into TPACK constructs, the study developed a new FC-situated TPACK framework. Themes 4 to 6 revealed that the teachers’ sense of efficacy increased overall but fluctuate slightly. Factors improving teacher efficacy included positive changes in student performance, supportive leadership and climate, effective group work among colleagues, and open-mindedness toward technology. While factors decreasing teacher efficacy encompassed adherence to a unified teaching model imposed by the department, technology’s non-user-friendly, and impersonal characteristics. This study provides a comprehensive view of how the sampled teachers applied FC-situated TPACK. Its findings also enhance the understanding of teacher efficacy, particularly in relation to FC instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Zhang & Xiaotian Fang, 2022. "Exploring University EFL Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Teacher Efficacy in Technology-integrated Flipped Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221116105
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221116105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221116105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221116105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221116105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.