IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211061536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management of Technological Innovation in Safety Evaluation Planning of Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Bai Xiaoping
  • Pu Tao

Abstract

The safety evaluation of construction projects is a very important problem. In the current study, the new smart methods especially for the complexity and variability of construction safety evaluation are absent. Combined with the engineering examples, this paper analyzes the sensitive factors that affect the construction project safety and makes discretizating of influencing factors based on expert and BIM technique. Based on BIM and Bayesian network, this paper established a new construction project safety evaluation model and presented the hybrid methods of strategic learning and knowledge management of technological innovation in construction project safety evaluation. Combined with the example of underground traffic engineering of Zhengzhou city comprehensive transportation hub, the Bayesian network was used to predict its security level. The probability of the safety level of the project in grade 3 is 0.614. Compared to other evaluation methods, presented hybrid method is more intelligent in strategic learning and knowledge management of technological innovation. Through the Bayesian network sensitivity analysis, we can know that the sensitivity factor of the construction project safety in the project is the construction risk, the continuous operation time, the protective measures, the material risk, and the number of maintenance. Presented detailed computational methods and steps in this paper can be used to improve the level of construction project safety effectively and help construction managers to take more effective control measures to prevent or reduce the occurrence of security incidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Bai Xiaoping & Pu Tao, 2021. "Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management of Technological Innovation in Safety Evaluation Planning of Construction Projects," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211061536
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211061536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211061536
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211061536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayirebi Dansoh & Samuel Frimpong & Daniel Oteng, 2017. "Industry environment features influencing construction innovation in a developing country: a case study of four projects in Ghana," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 65-95.
    2. Zubizarreta, Mikel & Cuadrado, Jesús & Iradi, Jon & García, Harkaitz & Orbe, Aimar, 2017. "Innovation evaluation model for macro-construction sector companies: A study in Spain," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mari-Isabella Stan, 2021. "Issues concerning the dynamics of labor productivity at the level of the companies in Constanta County operating in the "Construction" sector before and after the COVID-19 pandemic," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 225-241, November.
    2. Zubizarreta, Mikel & Arana-Landín, Germán & Wolff, Sarah & Egiluz, Ziortza, 2023. "Assessing the economic impacts of forest certification in Spain: A longitudinal study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    3. Chen, Yang & Li, Weiwei & Yi, Pingtao, 2020. "Evaluation of city innovation capability using the TOPSIS-based order relation method: The case of Liaoning province, China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. José Giménez & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Antonio Duréndez, 2019. "Competitive Capabilities for the Innovation and Performance of Spanish Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, October.
    5. WANG, La-yin & ZHAO, Dong, 2021. "Cross-domain function analysis and trend study in Chinese construction industry based on patent semantic analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Mari-Isabella Stan & Dragos-Florian Vintila, 2021. "Can the Degree of Indebtedness of the Economic Agents Operating in the Construction Sector in Constanta County Influence the Development of the Coastal Area ?," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 163-170, August.
    7. Oriol Pons & Jordi Franquesa & S. M. Amin Hosseini, 2019. "Integrated Value Model to Assess the Sustainability of Active Learning Activities and Strategies in Architecture Lectures for Large Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211061536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.