IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211054119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Diplomacy as a Network and Networking in International Relations: The Case of Cultural Diplomacy in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Ociepka
  • Justyna Arendarska

Abstract

This article discusses the European Union (EU) member states’ cultural institutes as nodes of cultural diplomacy networks and a network approach in the analysis of cultural diplomacy at the time of Russia’s war in eastern Ukraine and its annexation of Crimea in 2014. This study’s hypothesis is that the international crisis over the war in Ukraine pushed the EU member states to establish new ties linking their cultural establishments. The authors analyzed the EU countries’ cultural diplomacy documents and considered the concepts of network structure, network synergy, and issue networks to investigate whether EU governments—and especially their cultural agencies—understand cultural diplomacy as a network. The results of the study show that while the nodes of cultural diplomacy in Russia and the selected EU countries continued their communication during the international crisis, the expected interactions among CIs in Austria, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Poland were hardly established.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Ociepka & Justyna Arendarska, 2021. "Cultural Diplomacy as a Network and Networking in International Relations: The Case of Cultural Diplomacy in Russia," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211054119
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211054119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211054119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211054119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    2. Daniel Flemes, 2013. "Network Powers: strategies of change in the multipolar system," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 1016-1036.
    3. Virginie Mamadouh & Luiza Bialasiewicz & Hanna Jansen, 2016. "The Russian–Dutch Year of Friendship: Lgbti Rights as a Marker of Antagonism?," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(2), pages 203-208, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    2. Adler, Emanuel & Crawford, Beverly, 2004. "Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP)," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt6xx6n5p4, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:85-93 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Anna Michalski, 2013. "Europeanization of National Foreign Policy: The Case of Denmark's and Sweden's Relations with China," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 884-900, September.
    5. Armin Ibitz, 2015. "Towards a global scheme for carbon emissions reduction in aviation: China’s role in blocking the extension of the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 113-130, June.
    6. Mehdi Abbas & Catherine Locatelli, 2019. "Interdependence as a lever for national hybridization: The EU-Russia gas trade [L’hybridation des systèmes institutionnels nationaux dans l’interdépendance. Les échanges gaziers UE-Russie]," Post-Print hal-02472141, HAL.
    7. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Aline Burni & Benedikt Erforth & Ina Friesen & Christine Hackenesch & Maximilian Hoegl & Niels Keijzer, 2022. "Who Called Team Europe? The European Union’s Development Policy Response During the First Wave of COVID-19," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 524-539, February.
    9. Wolfgang Wagner, 2017. "Liberal Power Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1398-1414, November.
    10. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    11. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    12. Roter Petra, 2015. "International-local Linkages in Multistakeholder Partnerships Involved in Reconciliation, Inter-communal Bridgebuilding and Confidence-building," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 139-166, February.
    13. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:555-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mehdi Abbas & Catherine Locatelli, 2020. "National institutional systems’ hybridisation through interdependence. The case of EU-Russia gas relations," Post-Print hal-02272171, HAL.
    15. Frederik Stender & Axel Berger & Clara Brandi & Jakob Schwab, 2021. "The Trade Effects of the Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States: Early Empirical Insights from Panel Data," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1495-1515, November.
    16. Hak Je YU & Cornelia Alexandra LINCAN & Elena-Adina VOICILĂ, 2018. "Eu – A Stronger Global Actor: New Contexts For Eu-Korean Relations," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10(3), pages 306-325, November.
    17. Lauri Siitonen, 2022. "A normative power or fortress Europe? Normative policy coherence between the European Unionʼs development, migration, and foreign policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    18. Jürgen Rüland, 2018. "Coping with crisis: Southeast Asian regionalism and the ideational constraints of reform," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 155-168, June.
    19. Ajaree Tavornmas & Kasira Cheeppensook, 2020. "Shaping ocean governance: a study of EU normative power on Thailand’s sustainable fisheries," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 671-685, July.
    20. Juan José Tapia-León & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez, 2020. "Normative Power Europe as an Ingroup Projection? The EU’s Response to the Arab Uprising," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    21. Mario Telò, 2020. "Regionalism and Global Governance: The Alternative between Power Politics and New Multilateralism," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(2), pages 5-34, December.
    22. Andreas Grimmel & Viktor Eszterhai, 2020. "The Belt and Road Initiative and the Development of China’s Economic Statecraft: European Attitudes and Responses," International Studies, , vol. 57(3), pages 223-239, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211054119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.