IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p2158244021998363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students’ Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Vu Phi Ho Pham

Abstract

Collaborative writing is widely researched for its effects on students’ writing accuracy; however, previous research studies fail to prove its effects on students’ writing fluency. Also, none of the previous studies have investigated the framework for students to compose argumentative essays collaboratively. The purpose of this article is to fill these gaps. Sixty-two sophomore English-major students at a university in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, participated in the study. One difference in the treatment between the two groups was the composing stage. Twenty-seven students from the control group composed essays individually after they worked together for idea development to make an outline, whereas 35 students from the experimental group composed essays collaboratively. Data collection was from students’ pretests, posttests of both individually and collaboratively written papers, and from the semi-structured interviews. The study reveals that collaborative writing had great effects on students’ writing fluency in both collaboratively written papers and individually written papers. Also, the study invented an efficient framework for collaborative writing activities so that writing instructors could employ to their writing classrooms if they wish to.

Suggested Citation

  • Vu Phi Ho Pham, 2021. "The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students’ Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244021998363
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244021998363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244021998363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244021998363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vu Phi Ho Pham & Ngoc Hoang Vy Nguyen, 2020. "Blogging for Collaborative Learning in the Writing Classroom: A Case Study," International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244021998363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.