IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i2p2158244020924423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Patient Version of Person-Centered Critical Care Nursing Questionnaire: A Methodological Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jiwon Hong
  • Jiyeon Kang

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a questionnaire to evaluate person-centered critical care nursing from a patient perspective (PCCNPq). We created a 26-item preliminary questionnaire based on a literature review and qualitative interviews and administered it to 411 patients who had experienced critical care. We assessed the questionnaire’s reliability and validity using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis and tested internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The final version of the PCCNPq comprised five factors: compassion, expertise, communication, comfort, and respect. The model fit was satisfactory, and the items demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. In conclusion, the 20-item PCCNPq has acceptable reliability and validity and is applicable for assessing person-centered critical care nursing from a patient perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiwon Hong & Jiyeon Kang, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Patient Version of Person-Centered Critical Care Nursing Questionnaire: A Methodological Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020924423
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020924423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020924423
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020924423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilme Aro & Anna‐Maija Pietilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2012. "Needs of adult patients in intensive care units of Estonian hospitals: a questionnaire survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 1847-1858, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Ann‐Marie Storsveen & Hilde Wøien, 2020. "“Please mind the gap”: A secondary analysis of discomfort and comfort in intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2441-2454, July.
    2. Annelies Wassenaar & Mark van den Boogaard & Truus van der Hooft & Peter Pickkers & Lisette Schoonhoven, 2015. "‘Providing good and comfortable care by building a bond of trust’: nurses views regarding their role in patients' perception of safety in the Intensive Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3233-3244, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020924423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.