IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i2p2158244020924031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of the Appropriate Level(s) and Ratio of Value Contrast for Partially Sighted Individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Samaher Fallatah
  • Kristi S. Gaines
  • Nicole G. Adams
  • Erin Schambureck

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the appropriate level of value contrast in built environments, including the ratio of dark value to light value color, to enable people with low vision to distinguish elements more readily from the surroundings. The study included a total of 20 participants from four locations in Texas. Participants received a two-part questionnaire: Part 1 recorded demographic information including age, gender, and visual acuity; Part 2 presented the central questions of the study relating to given images. All of the participants agreed that high value contrast images with at least 60% variance between the dark and light values were very easy to see. Participants also indicated that medium value contrast images with a variance of 30% were recognizable. Most of the participants also indicated a preference for light value to dark value in a built environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Samaher Fallatah & Kristi S. Gaines & Nicole G. Adams & Erin Schambureck, 2020. "An Investigation of the Appropriate Level(s) and Ratio of Value Contrast for Partially Sighted Individuals," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020924031
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020924031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020924031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020924031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gulcin Yapici & Ahmet Öner Kurt & Seva Öner & Tayyar Şaşmaz & Resul Buğdaycı, 2019. "Determination of the Home Accident Frequency and Related Factors Among the People Older than 65 Years Old Living in Mersin City Center, Turkey," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    2. Randolph G. Bias & Kevin Larson & Sheng-Cheng Huang & Paul R. Aumer-Ryan & Chris Montesclaros, 2010. "An exploratory study of visual and psychological correlates of preference for onscreen subpixel-rendered text," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(4), pages 745-757, April.
    3. Randolph G. Bias & Kevin Larson & Sheng‐Cheng Huang & Paul R. Aumer‐Ryan & Chris Montesclaros, 2010. "An exploratory study of visual and psychological correlates of preference for onscreen subpixel‐rendered text," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(4), pages 745-757, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rashid, Lubna & Alzafari, Khaled & Kratzer, Jan, 2020. "Founder Personalities, Behaviors and New Venture Success in Sub-Saharan Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020924031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.