IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i1p41-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal termination strategies considering phase redundancy

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Li
  • Rubing Bai
  • Shaoqian Jia
  • Haibo Zhao

Abstract

Ensuring the survival of safety-critical systems, such as airplanes and submarines, is of utmost importance, even if it means incomplete task completion. System failures during task execution can have catastrophic consequences. Therefore, prioritizing system survival and temporarily suspending tasks are necessary measures to mitigate the risk of failure. Phase redundancy is a widely employed strategy to enhance the reliability of tasks. By incorporating task redundancy, it becomes possible to successfully accomplish the task even in the event of individual task failures. This study presents a novel condition-based task termination approach that leverages phase redundancy to strike a balance between task success and system survival. Specifically, the proposed approach dynamically terminates tasks based on specific condition information and task progress during each phase. To determine optimal termination thresholds, the study conducts iterative evaluations of task reliability and system survivability. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in enhancing the probability of system survival by maximizing overall success while prioritizing system safety through active consideration of the system condition and task progress when terminating tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Li & Rubing Bai & Shaoqian Jia & Haibo Zhao, 2025. "Optimal termination strategies considering phase redundancy," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(1), pages 41-54, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:1:p:41-54
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231222655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231222655
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231222655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:1:p:41-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.