IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v229y2015i4p301-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frequency domain reflectometry for remaining useful life estimation of instrumentation and control cables

Author

Listed:
  • Brent D Shumaker
  • Dan E McCarter
  • Hashem M Hashemian
  • Ryan D O’Hagan

Abstract

As the existing fleets of nuclear power plants age, a greater emphasis has been placed on technologies to quantify the remaining useful life of safety-critical components and to ensure that these systems will operate as intended when called upon, especially in emergency situations. Some of the most important, yet often overlooked components, are the cables that provide the signal paths for instrumentation and control systems used to ensure safe and efficient operation of nuclear power plants. Instrumentation and control cable aging, in particular, is primarily concerned with degradation of the polymer material by thermal oxidation while exposed to heat, humidity, radiation, and other environmental stressors. Consequently, as the polymer becomes embrittled, it cracks and becomes susceptible to moisture intrusion that can cause shorts and shunts in the cable circuits. This article describes the development of two prognostic models to estimate the remaining useful life of nuclear power plant cables. The first model uses data compiled in an existing polymer aging database as background for introducing the remaining useful life model development methodology. The second model uses data generated from accelerated cable aging experiments performed by the authors and explores the use of in situ electrical measurements such as frequency domain reflectometry for predicting the remaining useful life of instrumentation and control cables typically found in nuclear power plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Brent D Shumaker & Dan E McCarter & Hashem M Hashemian & Ryan D O’Hagan, 2015. "Frequency domain reflectometry for remaining useful life estimation of instrumentation and control cables," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 301-309, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:229:y:2015:i:4:p:301-309
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X14545623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X14545623
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X14545623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:229:y:2015:i:4:p:301-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.