IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v226y2012i6p666-676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative modeling of organizational resilience for Dutch emergency response safety regions

Author

Listed:
  • John MP van Trijp
  • Mihaela Ulieru
  • Pieter HAJM van Gelder

Abstract

Resilience is an important concept to determine how well a Dutch Emergency Response Safety Region behaves under stress. The main objective of this study is to determine the intrinsic value of “resilience†for Dutch Emergency Response Safety Regions. In this study it is concluded that the concept of “resilience†can be best described by the generic approach “operational resilience†. A large scale survey among safety stakeholders in The Netherlands was conducted where the following items describing operational resilience were explored: situation awareness ( awa ); management of keystone vulnerabilities ( kv ); adaptive capacity ( ac ) and quality ( q ). Results show resilience of an emergency response organization can be described by a unique dynamic operational resilience f ( R ero ) UV factor. A simplified approach of unique dynamic operational resilience is suggested by using a quick scan method to speed up the process of assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • John MP van Trijp & Mihaela Ulieru & Pieter HAJM van Gelder, 2012. "Quantitative modeling of organizational resilience for Dutch emergency response safety regions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(6), pages 666-676, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:6:p:666-676
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X12466371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X12466371
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X12466371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Canbolat, Yavuz Burak & Chelst, Kenneth & Garg, Nitin, 2007. "Combining decision tree and MAUT for selecting a country for a global manufacturing facility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 312-325, June.
    2. RogerS, Martin & Bruen, Michael, 1998. "A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELECTRE III," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 552-563, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bielza, Concha & Gómez, Manuel & Shenoy, Prakash P., 2011. "A review of representation issues and modeling challenges with influence diagrams," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 227-241, June.
    2. Dorota Górecka, 2012. "Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding techniques in the process of project management within the wedding planning business," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 22(4), pages 41-67.
    3. Amir Noori & Hossein Bonakdari & Khosro Morovati & Bahram Gharabaghi, 2018. "The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 471-488, December.
    4. Akpan, Uduak & Morimoto, Risako, 2022. "An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    6. Nzotcha, Urbain & Kenfack, Joseph & Blanche Manjia, Marceline, 2019. "Integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for pumped hydro-energy storage plant site selection from a sustainable development perspective with an application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 930-947.
    7. Kuo-Hsiang CHEN & Ching-Chien LIANG & Ya-Hsueh LEE, 2017. "Kansei approach for the design of functional products for the elderly," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejms_v2_i.
    8. Mohammad Ehsanifar & David A. Wood & Arezoo Babaie, 2021. "UTASTAR method and its application in multi-criteria warehouse location selection," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 202-215, June.
    9. Alessio Ishizaka & Philippe Nemery, 2013. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Framework for Partner Grouping When Sharing Facilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 773-799, July.
    10. Xenarios, S. & Tziritis, I., 2007. "Improving pluralism in Multi Criteria Decision Aid approach through Focus Group technique and Content Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 692-703, May.
    11. Jiménez, Antonio & Mateos, Alfonso & Ríos-Insua, Sixto, 2009. "Missing consequences in multiattribute utility theory," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 395-410, April.
    12. Mohammed Said Obeidat & Tarek Qasim & Aseel Khanfar, 2018. "Implementing the AHP multi-criteria decision approach in buying an apartment in Jordan," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 53-71, January.
    13. Ozgur Turetken, 2008. "Is your back-up IT infrastructure in a safe location?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 375-383, July.
    14. Lahdelma, Risto & Makkonen, Simo & Salminen, Pekka, 2009. "Two ways to handle dependent uncertainties in multi-criteria decision problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 79-92, February.
    15. Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2009. "Using expected values to simplify decision making under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 312-330, April.
    16. Patrik Aláč & Martin Čulík, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for the Material Flow of Resonant Wood Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Favretto, N. & Stringer, L.C. & Dougill, A.J. & Dallimer, M. & Perkins, J.S. & Reed, M.S. & Atlhopheng, J.R. & Mulale, K., 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to identify dryland ecosystem service trade-offs under different rangeland land uses," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 142-151.
    18. Cavallaro, Fausto, 2009. "Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1678-1685.
    19. Jafar Rezaei & Miłosz Kadziński & Chrysoula Vana & Lori Tavasszy, 2022. "Embedding carbon impact assessment in multi-criteria supplier segmentation using ELECTRE TRI-rC," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1445-1467, May.
    20. Gokhan Ozkaya & Mehpare Timor & Ceren Erdin, 2021. "Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Indicators and Comparisons of Countries through a Hybrid Model of Data Mining and MCDM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-49, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:6:p:666-676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.