IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v222y2008i2p219-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shaft diagnostics and prognostics development and evaluation using damaged dynamic simulation

Author

Listed:
  • S Wu
  • D He

Abstract

This paper presents a shaft damage dynamic simulation methodology for development and evaluation of effective diagnostic and prognostic algorithms. The methodology uses dynamic shaft vibration models to simulate vibration signals with arbitrary shaft and operating conditions. These simulated vibration signals are used to develop and validate different diagnostic and prognostic algorithms. A simulation study to demonstrate the application of the methodology is provided. In comparison with traditional methods that acquire data from test rig or operational machines, the presented methodology has the following three major benefits. (1) It is able to simulate signals under any shaft and operating conditions (crack size, speed, torque), which is important because of the cost and time required to gather comprehensive operational and test bench data for algorithm development and validation. (2) The methodology could capture nuance for tiny faults without the contamination of extraneous variables, such as ambient noise, test stand dynamics, etc., that are not present in the actual case. Accuracy in this regard is crucial when using vibration data to diagnose faults, for instance to distinguish the effect of noise from a minor crack. (3) It may approach the true signatures of naturally occurring and growing faults more closely by comparison with artificially seeded fault tests or highly accelerated fatigue tests.

Suggested Citation

  • S Wu & D He, 2008. "Shaft diagnostics and prognostics development and evaluation using damaged dynamic simulation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 219-233, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:222:y:2008:i:2:p:219-233
    DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/1748006XJRR108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1243/1748006XJRR108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:222:y:2008:i:2:p:219-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.