IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v8y1976i1pi-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic Labor: An Analysis of Housework and its Relation to the Production Process

Author

Listed:
  • Terry Fee

    (Dept. of Political Science University of California at Riverside Riverside, Ca 92507)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Terry Fee, 1976. "Domestic Labor: An Analysis of Housework and its Relation to the Production Process," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 8(1), pages -8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:8:y:1976:i:1:p:i-8
    DOI: 10.1177/048661347600800101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/048661347600800101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/048661347600800101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. François-Xavier Devetter, 2016. "Can Public Policies Bring about the Democratization of the Outsourcing of Household Tasks?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 365-393, September.
    2. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    3. Heidi I. Hartmann & Ann R. Markusen, 1980. "Contemporary Marxist Theory and Practice: A Feminist Critique," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 87-94, July.
    4. Ellen Mutari, 2001. ""...As broad as our life experience": visions of feminist political economy, 1972-1991," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 379-399, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:8:y:1976:i:1:p:i-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.