IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v54y2022i3p265-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Tremblay-Pepin

Abstract

This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Part of a larger research project aiming to merge certain features of these models, this article proposes five criteria to evaluate them. Following a proposal made by David Laibman, it adopts the organization and regulation criteria and add three others to them: limitation, formalization, and scope. Finally, the article offers a brief analysis of the models from those criteria. JEL Classification: P20, P51, B51

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Tremblay-Pepin, 2022. "Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 265-280, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:54:y:2022:i:3:p:265-280
    DOI: 10.1177/04866134221093747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/04866134221093747
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/04866134221093747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    democratic economic planning; Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman; Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel; Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell; negotiated coordination; participatory economics; postcapitalist models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General
    • P51 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems
    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:54:y:2022:i:3:p:265-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.